Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:34

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Be a super-ager — and join the ‘wellderly’ - The Times

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Does being poor build better character than being born rich?

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Single psilocybin trip delivers two years of depression relief for cancer patients - ScienceDaily

What’s next?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Hollywood actress popular for hit ’70s shows dead at 95 - NJ.com

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Thank you.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Why do older men like to get anal sex?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Bitcoin Rebounds as Markets Price in 'Short-Lived' Iran Conflict - Decrypt

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

What did Starbucks and Dunkin' Donuts do wrong in Sweden?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

‘The View’ Hosts Divided Over Patti LuPone Apology: ‘I Just Was Raised Differently, Clearly’ - TheWrap

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Why does Mars look purple, yellow and orange in ESA's stunning new satellite image? - Live Science